Publication:
Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing

Thumbnail Image

Date

2015

Published Version

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Carere, Deanna Alexis, Peter Kraft, Kimberly A. Kaphingst, J. Scott Roberts, and Robert C. Green. 2015. “Consumers report lower confidence in their genetics knowledge following direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing.” Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 18 (1): 65-72. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.34.

Research Data

Abstract

Purpose To measure changes to genetics knowledge and self-efficacy following personal genomic testing (PGT). Methods: New customers of 23andMe and Pathway Genomics completed a series of online surveys. Prior to receipt of results, and 6 months post-results, we measured genetics knowledge (9 true/false items) and genetics self-efficacy (5 Likert-scale items) and used paired methods to evaluate change over time. Correlates of change (e.g., decision regret) were identified using linear regression. Results: 998 PGT customers (59.9% female; 85.8% White; mean age 46.9±15.5 years) were included in our analyses. Mean genetics knowledge score out of 9 was 8.15±0.95 at baseline and 8.25±0.92 at 6 months (p = .0024). Mean self-efficacy score out of 35 was 29.06±5.59 at baseline and 27.7±5.46 at 6 months (p < .0001); on each item, 30–45% of participants reported lower self-efficacy following PGT. Change in self-efficacy was positively associated with health care provider consultation (p = .0042), impact of PGT on perceived control over one’s health (p < .0001), and perceived value of PGT (p < .0001), and negatively associated with decision regret (p < .0001). Conclusion: Lowered genetics self-efficacy following PGT may reflect an appropriate reevaluation by consumers in response to receiving complex genetic information.

Description

Keywords

direct-to-consumer genetic testing, personal genomic testing, genetic literacy, genomic literacy, self-efficacy, knowledge, commercial genetic testing

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Related Stories