Publication:

Radiographic prediction of meningioma grade by semantic and radiomic features

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Open/View Files

Date

2017

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Public Library of Science
The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you.

Research Projects

Organizational Units

Journal Issue

Citation

Coroller, T. P., W. L. Bi, E. Huynh, M. Abedalthagafi, A. A. Aizer, N. F. Greenwald, C. Parmar, et al. 2017. “Radiographic prediction of meningioma grade by semantic and radiomic features.” PLoS ONE 12 (11): e0187908. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187908.

Abstract

Objectives: The clinical management of meningioma is guided by tumor grade and biological behavior. Currently, the assessment of tumor grade follows surgical resection and histopathologic review. Reliable techniques for pre-operative determination of tumor grade may enhance clinical decision-making. Methods: A total of 175 meningioma patients (103 low-grade and 72 high-grade) with pre-operative contrast-enhanced T1-MRI were included. Fifteen radiomic (quantitative) and 10 semantic (qualitative) features were applied to quantify the imaging phenotype. Area under the curve (AUC) and odd ratios (OR) were computed with multiple-hypothesis correction. Random-forest classifiers were developed and validated on an independent dataset (n = 44). Results: Twelve radiographic features (eight radiomic and four semantic) were significantly associated with meningioma grade. High-grade tumors exhibited necrosis/hemorrhage (ORsem = 6.6, AUCrad = 0.62–0.68), intratumoral heterogeneity (ORsem = 7.9, AUCrad = 0.65), non-spherical shape (AUCrad = 0.61), and larger volumes (AUCrad = 0.69) compared to low-grade tumors. Radiomic and sematic classifiers could significantly predict meningioma grade (AUCsem = 0.76 and AUCrad = 0.78). Furthermore, combining them increased the classification power (AUCradio = 0.86). Clinical variables alone did not effectively predict tumor grade (AUCclin = 0.65) or show complementary value with imaging data (AUCcomb = 0.84). Conclusions: We found a strong association between imaging features of meningioma and histopathologic grade, with ready application to clinical management. Combining qualitative and quantitative radiographic features significantly improved classification power.

Description

Research Data

Keywords

Medicine and Health Sciences, Oncology, Cancers and Neoplasms, Neurological Tumors, Meningioma, Neurology, Diagnostic Medicine, Diagnostic Radiology, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Imaging Techniques, Radiology and Imaging, Signs and Symptoms, Necrosis, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hemorrhage, Vascular Medicine, Cancer Treatment, Surgical and Invasive Medical Procedures, Engineering and Technology, Signal Processing, Signal Filtering, Biology and Life Sciences, Anatomy, Musculoskeletal System, Skeleton, Skull

Terms of Use

This article is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material (LAA), as set forth at Terms of Service

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Related Stories