Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDesan, Christine
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-22T21:00:27Z
dc.date.issued1998
dc.identifier.citationChristine Desan, Remaking Constitutional Tradition at the Margin of the Empire: The Creation of Legislative Adjudication in Colonial New York, 16 Law & Hist. Rev. 257 (1998).en_US
dc.identifier.issn0738-2480en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10653424
dc.description.abstractIn 1750, Archibald Kennedy condemned New York's legislators for their radical constitutional innovation. “They take upon themselves to be the sole judges,” he stormed, and “‘insist… that no order for publick money shall issue, till their judgment has been obtained for it.’” Kennedy meant the charge literally. For almost half a century, New York legislators had preserved their power over the purse by determining claims made against the colony for money. In an arrangement sharply at odds with later legal doctrine on the separation of powers, the legislature—not the courts—had since 1706 settled contract claims for services and materials, demands for military pay and salaries, calls for compensation for the impressment of property, petitions for disability pensions, and a range of other claims.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.2307/744103en_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titleRemaking Constitutional Tradition at the Margin of the Empire: The Creation of Legislative Adjudication in Colonial New Yorken_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden_US
dc.relation.journalLaw and History Reviewen_US
dash.depositing.authorDesan, Christine
dash.embargo.until10000-01-01
dc.identifier.doi10.2307/744103*
dash.contributor.affiliatedDesan, Christine


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record