Structure of Mercaptobiphenyl Monolayers on Mercury

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Structure of Mercaptobiphenyl Monolayers on Mercury

Citable link to this page

 

 
Title: Structure of Mercaptobiphenyl Monolayers on Mercury
Author: Tamam, Lilach; Kraack, Henning; Sloutskin, Eli; Ocko, Benjamin M.; Pershan, Peter S.; Ulman, Abraham; Deutsch, Moshe

Note: Order does not necessarily reflect citation order of authors.

Citation: Tamam, Lilach, Henning Kraack, Eli Sloutskin, Benjamin M. Ocko, Peter S. Pershan, Abraham Ulman, and Moshe Deutsch. 2005. Structure of mercaptobiphenyl monolayers on mercury. Journal of Physical Chemistry B 109(25): 12534-12543.
Access Status: Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time (“dark deposit”). For more information on dark deposits, see our FAQ.
Full Text & Related Files:
Abstract: The molecular-scale structure and phase behavior of single-component Langmuir films of 4‘-methyl-4-mercaptobiphenyl (MMB) and 4‘-perfluoromethyl-4-mercaptobiphenyl (FMMB) on mercury were studied using surface tensiometry, grazing incidence X-ray diffraction, and X-ray reflectivity. At low coverages, a condensed but in-plane disordered single layer of surface-parallel molecules is found for both compounds. At high coverages, both compounds exhibit in-plane-ordered phases of standing-up molecules. For MMB, the biphenyl core dominates the structure, yielding a centered-rectangular unit cell with an area A\(_x\) of 21.8 Å\(^2\)/molecule, with molecules tilted by \(\sim\)14\(^\circ\) from the surface normal in the nearest-neighbor direction, and a coherence length \(\xi\) of >1000 Å for the crystalline domains. For FMMB, the perfluoromethyl group dominates the structure, yielding a hexagonal unit cell with untilted molecules, an area A\(_x\) of 24.2 Å\(^2\)/molecule, and a much smaller \(\xi\) of \(\sim\)110 Å. The structure is discussed in comparison with self-assembled monolayers of MMB on crystalline Au(111) and similar-length alkanethiolate SAMs on Au(111) and on mercury. The differences in the structure are discussed and traced to the differences in the substrate's surface structure, and in the molecular cross section and rigidity.
Published Version: doi:10.1021/jp050278j
Other Sources: http://www.liquids.deas.harvard.edu/peter/2005.pdf/JPC_109.12534.pdf
Citable link to this page: http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10354243
Downloads of this work:

Show full Dublin Core record

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

 
 

Search DASH


Advanced Search
 
 

Submitters