CONTRASTS AND INTERACTIONS REDUX: Five Easy Pieces

 
View/Open
QUANT,PS96,FiveEasyPieces.pdf (1.276Mb)
Access Status
Full text of the requested work is not available in DASH at this time ("restricted access"). For more information on restricted deposits, see our FAQ.
Author
Rosnow, Ralph
Published Version
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00369.x
Metadata
Show full item record
Citation
Ralph L. Rosnow and Robert Rosenthal. 1996. "CONTRASTS AND INTERACTIONS REDUX: Five Easy Pieces." Psychological Science 7, No. 4: 253-257.
Abstract
ThIs reply to Abelson (this Issue) and Petty, Fabrtgar, Wegener, and Priester (this issue) is couched within the framework offive basic principles advising that we (1) hang on to what we predicted long enough to test It (Tarzan's leap), (2) be wary of beguiling statistical designs that may not address the question of Interest (the Sirens' song), (3) not allow well worn habits of thinking to ensnare our perceptions (Lavoisier's crease), (4) weigh the possIbIlity of more than one correct hypothesis (the dayyan's decree), and (5) not confuse unplanned wIth planned contrasts (the archer's aim).
Citable link to this page
http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11718214

Collections

Comments made during the workflow steps
FLAG2 Cannot archive publisher's version per Sherpa Romeo.