Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRoohipoor, Ramaken_US
dc.contributor.authorRiazi-Esfahani, Mohammaden_US
dc.contributor.authorEbrahimiadib, Nazaninen_US
dc.contributor.authorKarkhaneh, Rezaen_US
dc.contributor.authorZarei, Mohammaden_US
dc.contributor.authorBesharat, Saraen_US
dc.contributor.authorGhassemi, Faribaen_US
dc.contributor.authorOstovaneh, Mohammad Rezaen_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-05-02T16:59:21Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.citationRoohipoor, Ramak, Mohammad Riazi-Esfahani, Nazanin Ebrahimiadib, Reza Karkhaneh, Mohammad Zarei, Sara Besharat, Fariba Ghassemi, and Mohammad Reza Ostovaneh. 2015. “Predictive Value of Pupillary Response to Mydriatic Agents for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity.” Journal of Ophthalmic & Vision Research 10 (4): 417-423. doi:10.4103/2008-322X.176892. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2008-322X.176892.en
dc.identifier.issn2008-2010en
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:26859980
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the feasibility of screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) by assessing the pupillary response to mydriatics. Methods: This observational case series included 134 eyes of 67 premature infants with birth weight less than 2,000 grams and gestational age less than 33 weeks. A composite eye drop composed of phenylephrine 1%, tetracaine and tropicamide 0.5% was applied 3 times within 5-minute intervals and pupil diameters were measured. The eyes were examined by experienced ROP specialists using an indirect ophthalmoscope. Zone and stage of ROP, presence of plus disease and need for treatment were recorded. The relationship between the pupillary response to mydriatics, and presence and severity of ROP was evaluated. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis. Results: According to receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, final pupil diameter after mydriatic administration was found the most accurate factor among other factors to recognize ROP zone I from zones II and III (Area under ROC: 0.92 [95%CI: 0.85-0.98]). The best cutoff value for final pupil diameter was 5.6 mm, because it could differentiate involvement of zone I from zones II and III with sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 100%. Conclusion: Response of the pupil to mydriatic eye drops may be useful as a less invasive method for rough estimation of ROP in high risk babies who need emergent attention; however, it cannot be considered as a screening test due to its low sensitivity.en
dc.language.isoen_USen
dc.publisherMedknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltden
dc.relation.isversionofdoi:10.4103/2008-322X.176892en
dc.relation.hasversionhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4795391/pdf/en
dash.licenseLAAen_US
dc.subjectMydriatic Eye Dropsen
dc.subjectPredictive Valueen
dc.subjectPupillary Responseen
dc.subjectRetinopathy of Prematurityen
dc.subjectScreeningen
dc.titlePredictive Value of Pupillary Response to Mydriatic Agents for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurityen
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.description.versionVersion of Recorden
dc.relation.journalJournal of Ophthalmic & Vision Researchen
dash.depositing.authorEbrahimiadib, Nazaninen_US
dc.date.available2016-05-02T16:59:21Z
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/2008-322X.176892*
dash.contributor.affiliatedEbrahimiadib, Nazanin


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record