Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorThompson, Dennis
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-08T13:14:24Z
dc.identifierQuick submit: 2018-06-11T17:15:14-0400
dc.identifier.citationThompson. Dennis F. 2004. Public Reason and Precluded Reasons. Fordham Law Review 72, no. 5: 2073-2088.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:42658242*
dc.description.abstractPublic reason seems an odd idea. Re-fraining from telling the whole truth—deliberately ignoring reasons that are relevant to reaching a well-grounded decision—seems more like a vice than a virtue. It is like swearing to tell the partial truth, and nothing but the partial truth. Yet for Rawls, something like this oath is a duty of all citizens—a “moral ... duty of civility.”en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipPhilosophyen_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dc.titlePublic Reason and Precluded Reasonsen_US
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dc.date.updated2018-06-11T21:15:15Z
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.relation.journalFordham Law Reviewen_US
dash.depositing.authorThompson, Dennis
dc.date.available2004
dc.date.available2020-04-08T13:14:24Z
dash.contributor.affiliatedThompson, Dennis


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record